Gorilla vs 100 Men: who wins?
Some readers might accuse me of leveraging viral internet memes to generate content. And honestly, they'd have a fair point. However, I believe this also presents an opportunity to dive into an interesting and important discussion: how does one actually "win" a fight? The answer largely depends on how we define both "fight" and "win."
To keep things straightforward, let's define "fight" as a physical altercation involving the threat or infliction of bodily harm. By "win," we mean neutralizing your opponent's ability to harm you—ideally, while maintaining your own functionality. With those definitions in mind, there are three fundamental ways to win a fight.
1. Disable your opponent’s central processing unit (the brain): This can be achieved in one of three ways: delivering concussive trauma severe enough to knock them unconscious, restricting their oxygen supply to the point where they pass out, or causing significant blood loss that reduces brain perfusion to the extent that they can no longer remain upright or functional.
2. Inflict debilitating damage to their musculoskeletal system: This involves causing enough physical harm to their muscles, bones, or joints that they are no longer capable of functioning effectively.
3. Eliminate their will to fight: This can be achieved by employing strategies such as de-escalation, intimidation, or delivering enough pain or injury to convince the assailant that continuing the fight is not in their best interest.
The third option becomes especially interesting in certain theoretical scenarios. Take, for example, the thought experiment of 100 men versus 1 gorilla. Some have explored this concept using simulated programs, where the gorilla typically annihilates the 100 men with ease. However, these simulations fail to capture the complexities of a real-life altercation. The humans in these simulations don’t employ any kind of strategy—there’s no attempt to confuse, bait, intimidate, or organize. Instead, they charge at the gorilla mindlessly, effectively offering themselves up for destruction. Similarly, the gorilla is shown executing its rampage without hesitation or concern. Such unrealistic depictions ignore a key factor: the will to fight.
In reality, human behavior in a high-stakes situation is often dictated by self-preservation. Witnessing the first few teammates meet a grisly fate would likely prompt many individuals to retreat rather than continue their assault. Likewise, a gorilla surrounded by 100 humans would likely look for a way to avoid conflict rather than engage all of them. The driving force behind these decisions is simple: the will to fight depends on context, not just personality. Motivation plays a critical role, as individuals weigh the risks and benefits of continuing a confrontation. What’s to gain? What’s at stake? What are the odds of success? This is a value proposition, and while people may not always evaluate it accurately, their willingness to fight is often determined by their perception of it. In fact, most altercations are resolved or avoided altogether by influencing the assailant’s willingness to continue, rather than through brute force.
In a self-defense context, the key question becomes: how can you manipulate an attacker’s will to fight? Understanding the psychology of a potential assailant is crucial. By projecting confidence, maintaining strong body language, and employing de-escalation techniques, you can alter their perception of you as a target. Alertness is another powerful tool. Being fully present and aware of your surroundings allows you to detect potential threats early, giving you the opportunity to avoid conflict altogether. Most attackers operate like ambush predators and look for easy targets. If you display a high level of awareness and cannot easily be caught off guard, an assailant is likely to move on to someone less prepared. Recognizing subtle cues—such as shifts in body language, changes in tone of voice, or unusual behaviors—enables you to take proactive steps to ensure your safety before any confrontation escalates.
In the end the question remains- who wins in a fight the gorilla or 100 men. To be honest I am not sure, but I suspect it has more to do with the participants tolerance for the threat of injury, pain and death than actually fighting prowess.
Add comment
Comments